Pack Envelope — define your pack dimensions. All calculations update live.
11.27 L total
Cell Parameters
Pack Volume Budget
Full: 11.27 L 9.58 L available
% reserved for BMS, bus bars, thermal management
✦ Recommended Dims
Computing...
Optimized for max capacity at 51–58 V target
Active Chemistry
NMC
Cell Dimensions
Cell Electrical
Electrode Stack (per unit cell)
Physical
Pack Target
Pack Configuration
Total Cells
Pack Voltage
Pack Capacity
Cell Stack Model
Stacked Unit Cells
185µm/unit cell
Derived Cell Capacity
mAh/layer × layers
Energy & Density
Energy
Volumetric Density
Gravimetric
Physical
Pack Weight
Volume Utilization
Cells Fit (Max)
Active Vol Fraction
pack-level · excl. overhead
Cell Weight (calc)
cathode+anode+sep+CC+electrolyte+case
Al Casing Weight
estimated Al can mass
2D Cell Diagram — Individual Cell
Cell Layout
50 mm
Cell
Gap
Unused
Volume Utilization
Cell Parameters
Pack Volume Budget
Full: 11.27 L 9.02 L available
% reserved for bus bars, wiring harness, thermal management
✦ Recommended Dims
Computing...
Optimized diameter × height for max capacity at 51–58 V target
Active Chemistry
NMC
Cell Format
Cell Electrical
Physical
Pack Target
Best Orientation (auto)
Calculating...
Pack Configuration
Total Cells
Pack Voltage
Pack Capacity
Jelly Roll Model
Electrode Area
jelly roll vol ÷ 185µm/bilayer
Derived Cell Capacity
mAh/cm² × area
Energy & Density
Energy
Volumetric Density
Gravimetric
Physical
Pack Weight
Volume Utilization
Hex Packing
Active Vol Fraction
pack-level · excl. overhead
Al Can Weight
estimated Al can + caps
2D Cell Diagram — Individual Cell
Cell Layout
50 mm
Cell
Interstitial
Unused
Hex Pack Efficiency
PCC Parameters
Pack Volume Budget
Full: 11.27 L 10.37 L available
% reserved — PCC inherently safe: minimal thermal mgmt needed
✦ Recommended Dims
Computing...
Optimized X × Y for max capacity at 51–58 V target (8% overhead)
Mono-cell Voltage
3.7V NMC
Sub-Stack Footprint
Electrode Stack (per mono-cell)
Pack Target
⟡ PCC Advantages
Any Shape Cells conform to pack geometry — no wasted corners
Metal-Free C-Polymer replaces Cu/Al — 88% lighter current collectors
No Tabs Needed Bipolar stack — current flows axially, no parallel tab welding
Inherently Safe Non-conductive polymer — no internal short circuit propagation
No Rigid Casing Zero aluminum housing — 100% of cell volume is active electrode material vs ~92–96% for prismatic/cylindrical
Stack Architecture
Mono-cells/Stack
Parallel Sub-Stacks
Sub-Stack Dims
Pack Output
Pack Voltage
Pack Capacity
Energy
Density & Weight Advantage
Volumetric Density
Vol. Utilization
vs ~85% prismatic
Pack Weight
Cost Savings vs Metal Current Collectors
*CC Cost (Cu + Al foil)
*CC Cost (PCC)
Savings / Pack
2D Cell Diagram — PCC Sub-Stack Footprint
Stack Layout
50 mm
Cathode
Anode
PCC Layer
Separator
Volume Fill
Visual Comparison — Same Pack Volume, Same Scale
▪ Prismatic
Vol. Util
Energy
● Cylindrical
Vol. Util
Energy
◆ PCC (Kavian)
Vol. Util
Energy
Interactive 3D Pack Comparison — Same Scale, Full Layout
▪ Prismatic
● Cylindrical
◆ PCC (Kavian)
Live Metrics — NMC 811 — All 3 Configs
Metric ▪ Prismatic ● Cylindrical ◆ PCC (Kavian) BEST PCC vs Prismatic PCC vs Cylindrical
Energy (kWh)
Pack Voltage (V)
Pack Capacity (Ah)
Volumetric Density (Wh/L)
excl. overhead ↓



Gravimetric Density (Wh/kg)
Pack Weight (kg)
Volume Utilization (%)
excl. overhead ↓



Active Vol Fraction (%)
excl. overhead ↓



Cell Count
*CC Cost / Pack (est.)
*CC Cost / kWh
$/kWh · pack level · key sales metric
◆ PCC Performance Summary
Calculating…
*CC — Current Collectors (Cu foil anode + Al foil cathode; cost derived from foil thickness × material density × $/kg)

Kavian Dry-Process Electrodes

Interested in these results for your pack design?

Contact Sakuu's team to discuss how PCC technology can meet your energy density and cost targets.